
Power Mac G5 and Apple display.
The world and his dog are buying Apple computers these days. Once upon a time they where the reserve of graphic designers, musicians and those who simply couldn't find niche scientific and educational software anywhere else.
With the evolution of the Mac operating system, from OS version 9 through to todays 'Tiger' version 10.4.5 the days of the Mac's image as an expensive artist's tool, rather than a home 'PC' have gone, and probably forever.
Of course Apple still make high end professional machines for everything from video editing to complex climate modeling, but it's the low end machines like the Mac Mini and the iMac which have brought the Mac back into the home office and even the living room.
This turn around in Apple's fortunes, from being almost bankrupt in the early 90's to one of todays most successful software and hardware companies, was given as close to a guarantee to continued good fortune as you can get in the IT business, towards the end of last year, when Apple announced a secretly long planned strategy to switch from using IBM's power hungry and slow Power PC microprocessors to the faster, less expensive next generation of Intel chips, a brand ubiquitous on machines predominantly designed to run Microsoft's Windows operating system.
Within days of the release of the first Mac's with an Intel inside, the race was on to see who could be the first to install Windows on one; and by Mar 16th 2006, Colin Nederkoorn did just that, bagging himself $13,000 in the process.
Not two weeks later and perhaps one of the biggest stories to come from Apple in a long time, at least one that is not directly related to a whole new product release, hit the headlines. BootCamp, a boot manager designed to do the job which Nederkoorn's "hack" had done; except complete with working drivers for Windows, so as to allow the use of USB, different monitor sizes and numerous other things which Nederkoorn's solution did not yet include.
The single biggest excuse most Windows users who would like to try a Mac give for not buying one is that they need to run various applications which aren't available for the Mac as part of their job or hobby or both. While for the most part it's simply not true to say there isn't as much choice in software for the Mac, the perception never-the-less persistently dogs the platform, thanks in some part to devious methods used by the beige box manufactures and partly thanks to plain and simple ignorance on the part of stack-'em-high sell 'em cheap computer superstore staff.
Now that it's not only possible to run Windows on a Mac, but it's something which is actively supported by Apple, the last barrier to buying hardware from Apple, for most people, is effectively gone for good; not least because, unless you are a really serious gamer, Apple now, rather ironically, make some of the fastest Windows home PC's money can buy; and without all those cheap looking and frankly pointless bits of "scary" day-glow plastic.
Here then is a run down of some things people who have simply never used a Mac before might like to take a look at, once they get over their initial tendency to boot directly into Windows.
Resources:
Great article! As a relatively new convert (6 months), there are a lot of things on here I didn't even know. That label thing is awesome!
Yes, thanks for the article, I've clipped it. I'm a soon to be convert.
Don't wait! Take the plunge. You'll be glad. I have yet to meet a person who made the switch and hated it.
Good article. I am also a relatively new Mac user. It's been a year since I got my first Mac and right now I only use PC's at work. I agree with the iLife comment. I've made a dozen or so DVD's on my Mac and I had struggled with the same task on my PC. The PC video editing software was never easy to use. With iLife I can finally enjoy the results of my work.
I would actually go with Quicksilver over Spotlight. Fast file searching as well as application launching.
They both have there uses, I couldn't last a second with out Quicksilver (its very quick) but as for actually searching for stuff on my HD Spotlight works pretty well, albeit its a bit slow.
Excellent points, I believe that you are right and that Mircosoft has to make a comeback now or risk loseing it's shrinking userbase.
Before all of the Mac haters jump in here to offer their wisdom, I think we should point out that Microsoft doesn't really have a "shrinking" userbase.
While over the past several years many people have walked over to the Mac side, plenty of folks out there are stubborn enough that they're just going to continue using Windows. People are curious, and even in some cases, willing to try out a Mac, but it doesn't mean that they're drinking Steve's kool-aid just yet.
A five-percent market share isn't any indication that Macs are about to take over the world, so before we get ahead of ourselves let's just be thankful that Macs are making good inroads to our computing future. Slowly but surely people are discovering the joys of Mac and OS X but only time will tell if Apple has the potential to reel in a high market share.
Great article!
I currently own a Dell 700m laptop, but have used Macs consistently for the last 3 years. My university's central computing site is stocked with dual-flat-panel dual-G5 Powermacs, and I do most of my design work there (full Adobe and Macromedia software suites). They spoil us.
Anyway, these are some great tips (esp. the Spotlight and labels tips) for me, as I'm buying a Mac as soon as Intel-based iBook replacements are released (or maybe say "hell with it" and buy a Rev B Macbook Pro). With Boot Camp, I have no reason not to get a Mac now.
Sidenote: The Macbooks really need a second mouse button. Ctrl+[click] is pretty convenient, but I'm so very accustommed to a hardware right-click.
Two years ago, I couldn't see why artists and media designers loved Macs so much, but it became readily apparent to me that, among other perks, Mac OS X renders text so much more cleanly than Windows, and Finder+Expose gives me a much more intuitive multi-application workspace.
Now, let's just hope that Adobe CS3 Universal Binary isn't delayed.
I agree with the author about the misconception. However, many times when you are out and about, you don't have the convenience of a USB mouse. It is in those instances where a right-click on the trackpad would be great.
Of course, there are reasons against having a right-click placed there, as it would ruin the beautiful symmetry of the Macbook Pro. I've gotten used to using ctrl-click so it ain't so bad.
@ James:
Thanks for the info, but I wasn't talking about that.
Hehe, I've done enough research in Macs over the last few years to know their compatibilities with any USB mouse adn keyboard, including Logitech's and Microsoft's excellent multi-button optical mice.
What I meant was that I often use my laptop on my lap, sitting in a chair, and a physical mobile mouse is just too cumbersome. Right now, I'm actually typing this with my laptop in my lap, and I need only to move my right thumb an inch and a half to reach the center of my touchpad. That convenience, over packing a separate piece of hardware that requires a flat surface, is the reason I want a right-click on my future Macbook.
That being said, I personally don't like the Mighty Mouse, as the dual-touch-sensor algorithm it uses to detect a right-click means that I cannot rest my index finger on the left side if I want to right-click. I've gotten used to Ctrl-[click] to a pretty good degree, and have actually caught myself trying to Ctrl-[click[ and hitting F9 for Expose on my Dell after several hours at a Mac.
P.S. - I do like the nipple, though squeezing is awkward.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |