Visit Citizen James's column >>

CITIZEN JAMESHome Page

Mac user, podcaster, photographer and musician.
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 27; Links Seeded: 28
Member Since: 1/2006Last Seen: 5/20/2007

New to Mac? Like-for-like applications and tips for switchers.

advertisement

I recently wrote an article for newsvine on Apple's story so far; their journey towards greater market share. The article also touched upon some tips on using Mac OS X that recent switchers found helpful.

So, in follow-up to that, I thought it might be similarly useful to expand upon that original article with a look at Mac equivalents, like-for-like where appropriate, and compare the Windows way to the Mac way, as well as highlight some useful third party titles, which add to the Mac experience, from both the open source and shareware / freeware community.

The problem, if you can call it that, with OS X is that it is so flexible and easy to work with that sometimes, if you're used to the "Do it Mircosoft's way or don't do it at all" method in which Windows works, finding your way around OS X can, ironically, be quite awkward at first.

I remember a friend of mine who had never used a Mac before, but who purchased one on my advice thorough sheer frustration at the endless spyware, worms and security problems with his Windows machine, frantically calling me up one day because he couldn't find the control panel that removes and installs icons to and from the dock; and what a revelation it was to him that it was actually just as simple as dragging and dropping. Wake up internet 2.0, my tech blog, has some video clip examples of this.

Installing and removing programs.

If there is a better example on the differences between Windows and Mac than how both systems handle the installation and removal of software, I've yet to read it. Some things in the installing of any software are, by the nature of what you're doing, processes which are similar on both platforms to a certain extent, in that certain types of installers must have permission to write to the system folder, which only the user can allow or disallow.

In the case of Mac OS this occasionally requires the input of the administrator password, the pass which you must enter to gain sudo root access to the UNIX underpinnings; something which really couldn't be made any easier to do by OS X simply popping up a window whenever this is required. Similarly with Windows the user must be logged into an account which has administrative privileges, but rather inconveniently it doesn't allow temporary admin access for the installation of applications to ordinary users.

The rigmarole of installing programs on Windows is made all the more laborious by everything from installers that insist on restarting, before they even begin, to captions which "forget" that the user needs to click on an "OK" button which is obscured by a horrible splash screen, which itself insist on being "always-on-top" in full screen. Examples of this sort of uglyness, from the top of my head, baring in mind I no longer use Windows on anything more than a once-per-week for less than an hour basis, would be Direct X, Photoshop and (blush) Quicktime, but I'm certain there are hundreds if not thousands more.

When it comes to software removal the Windows way is pretty much the install process in reverse. Click here, allow this, allow that and then, you guessed it, the dreaded restart. Yes, I want to restart my computer just to remove a calculator. Not that doing an uninstall has any effect on the myriad of malicious spyware which, rather cruelly, come with an uninstaller which doesn't actually work but invariably simply further embeds it's hateful self deeper into the registry.

On the Mac, to remove an application, you put it in the trash. And that's it; although you can scrape back the unused disc space which a removed application's redundant system files take up by using a third party uninstaller, such as the excellent app zapper.

Video editing.

While iMovie is pretty much the definitive easy to use video editor, and it comes with every new Mac as part of the iLife suite, there are some types of editing it's easier to use other applications for. After all, you don't always necessarily want to insert cross-fade edits and text captions or apply filter effects and transitions to a video. Most of the time in fact, especially when it comes to clips you download from the internet, you simply want to convert them into a file format which will play on another device, such as a play station portable, or you want to write the file onto a disc which plays in a consumer, set-top DVD player.

  • ffmpegX is a Mac OS interface to the popular command line UNIX / Linux tools mencoder and mplayer. You can convert just about any video file into any other kind of file, including a number of other powerful things, such as separation of audio from video, known as demuxing, and DVD file image wrapping, so that a folder containing your VIDEO_TS and AUDIO_TS disc structure can be burned to DVD using Apple's Disk Utilities (Mac HD > Applications > Utilities).

    ffmpegX is, best of all perhaps, completely free, but since it's open source roots (no pun intended) plant it firmly in the territory of applications which appeal to the geek, don't be surprised if experimenting with it leads you to some scary looking web sites, read-me's and wiki's, which talk about using the command line UNIX terminal, in a language which assumes you know what you're doing and you are either a programmer or already familiar with UNIX in some way.

    Having said that, I'm no über-geek, and I managed to do some nifty command line stuff with mencoder which converted video into a file which played on Linux for iPod, so don't be too put off by it being essentially a command line application - besides the fact that most operations are drag and drop simple, with presets and templates in ffmpegX, which separate you entirely from the command line.

    I'd say the closest equivalent application to ffmpegX on the Windows side is TmpgEnc, which is not free and can be slow and buggy, although it does have more options than ffmpegX when it comes to snipping out sections of unwanted video and, reversely, splicing different clips together.

  • Snapz pro x is a great tool for capturing motion video of your OS X desktop. You can draw a selection around an area and have the camera track your mouse or stay fixed. It outputs the captured file in a variety of formats and is very intuitive to use. You can see examples of Snapz pro X video screen grabs I made on my blog, to accompany this article.
  • TV Tuner and home theater.

    Windows Media PC's are an attractive option to anyone wanting to set-up a home theater system, for watching DVDs and using as a personal video recorder. The expensive ones work well, the cheeper ones I've seen can be frustrating, particularly when they drop frames and crash half way through a minority interest program you recorded weeks ago and have no way of finding on bit-torrent through sheer lack of popularity (I speak as a Jazz music and nature documentary fan surrounded by bit-torrenters who think 'Lost' and 'Desperate housewives' are witty and compelling drama).

    Elgato EyeTV to the rescue. The little USB device, infra red remote control and fully functional recording and editing software combination which turns your Mac into a media center. EyeTV is Mac only and it makes the Windows equivalents, like WinTV for example, look like a 5 year old operating system in a cheap plastic box with tacky green, go faster fluorescent lights in the case.

    The software works like a dream, when waking your Mac from standby, if a program you have scheduled from the program guide is due to start. The guide is automatically downloaded from the digital terrestrial transponder in your FreeView (UK) area.

    You can also add a program to your recording schedule from anywhere in the world via tvtv.co.uk, so being on the other side of the world is no excuse for missing The Simpsons.

    You can see screen grabs of the Elgato software in action on my blog.

    Music recording and audio editing.

    Once the domain almost exclusively of the Macintosh, the Windows PC has certainly done some impressive catching-up, when it comes to professional recording, MIDI sequencing and audio editing applications, in recent years. But few would argue that the cream of the crop in this area are three applications which really work best in their spiritual home, on the Mac.

  • Pro tools is to music recording studios, the world over, what Photoshop is photography. The software itself is fairly simply, in as much as it doesn't really require a particularly fast host machine, although as much RAM as you can afford is essential. It's the hardware which really makes pro-tools the tool of choice, but at a cost.
  • Digital Performer is a very impressive second to pro-tools dominance and has, some same, a much more intuitive MIDI editor. Like pro-tools, Digital performer's strength is in it's tight integration with the Mark of the Unicorn hardware. If you want to record 24, or even 100 tracks of audio at once, and have each of those tracks go to 8 separate sub-groups, which in turn have 3 or 4 RAM hungry audio compressors, reverb chambers, delay lines and effects plug-in's inserted into them, the only real question is, "Do I really want to trust all of that to Windows?"
  • Logic is Apple's stab at the MIDI sequencer, audio editor / recorder market and, as you'd expect, it's incredibly easy to use, stable and boasts some powerful tools. eMagic, the company which Apple acquired some years ago, began developing Logic back when the only application comparable to it was Steinberg's Cubase VST. Today, as an Apple title, its appearance and interface lay-out, much more than the other two applications, still share some similarities with Cubase, but where Cubase became rather stayed and almost old fashioned Logic triumphs, by being positive and snappy, even on low end systems. Being an Apple title, of course, it is no longer available for Windows.
  • All three of these high to mid-price titles weigh in at a running cost far in excess of anything the passive hobbyist, who perhaps wants to tinker with MIDI and occasionally record their garage band or re-mix a dance track, can realistically afford. Thank the maker then, the open source community, once again, comes to the rescue.

  • Audacity is a multi-track audio recorder which enables you to edit, add effects and record audio into your Windows, Mac or Linux machine. It would be wrong to suggest it does this with anywhere near the slickness and ease of use you'd expect from Logic, pro-tools or Digital Performer. What Audacity does deliver though is something akin to the popular, but Windows only application, Cool Edit Pro, by syntrillium, which is now part of Adobe who produce the software under the name audition.

    Audacity has risen to greater popularity of late thanks to it being ideal for PodCasting. You can drag and drop most kinds of audio files into it's editor window and splice, chop, add effects and, as you'd expect, output your finished recording as an MP3 or AIFF, the latter being the file format of choice for creating enhanced PodCasts, which are a kind of PodCast which can display changing graphics and information about the recording in the iTunes artwork window, and on the iPod's screen, while playing.

  • It's also worth pointing out that Garage Band is also not only included free with every new Mac, but is itself an excellent audio recording and editing tool, which can host third party audio units and VST plug-ins and includes enhanced PodCasting tools for exporting to iWeb, iLife's web site design and publishing software.

    Workflow tips and Finder tricks.

  • Most people know that Apple + Shift + 3 will output a screenshot as a picture file to your OS X desktop. If you want to capture the whole desktop this is fine, but if you want to only capture a specific area you can always use 4, in place of 3, which brings up a cross-hairs selection tool. Hit the space bar at this point and you can highlight a whole window, menu or dialogue box, in fact any single item currently visible. Hold down CTRL and rather than outputting a file, OS X will send the screenshot or selection to your clipboard, so all you have to do, if you're assembling a montage of screenshots for instance in Photoshop, is paste your clipboard into your working document. None of this is currently achievable in Windows without using third party applications and, as far as I know, there will be no improvement in the way Windows Vista handles such things, when it's eventually released in Spring / Summer 2012.
  • Smart folders in the Finder allow you to automatically keep Spotlight-like criteria attached to a folder. So if you want to instantly see all of your text documents which have mention in them of key-words like "Deadline", or "Customer Address", or if they where created before a certain date and have a red label attached to them, then, regardless of whether or not the originating documents are in the same folder as each other, or if they are spread around your network, you can automatically keep track of them in one folder which dynamically and intelligently tracks them. Wake up internet 2.0, my tech blog, has some video clip examples of this.
  • It's been hinted that Apple's Steve Jobs is no fan of the current so-called nested folders way of organizing files, and that not so long in the future, Mac OS will do away with the current method which all three of the major operating systems use. Smart folders are a rather simple, but effective example of how this radicle re-think in the way we view the information on our computers will change, if this goes ahead.

  • Automaton. Similar in some ways to smart folders, Automator allows you to attach a script to a folder, so that when certain criteria are met a task is carried out. One of the things which people new to Mac OS X are immediately impressed by is Applescript, Apple's scripting language, which can be used to carry out tasks ranging from the mundane to the ridiculous.
  • I honestly struggle to imagine how I managed my business without the added efficiency which automator has brought to my average working day. I've constantly got folders full of photographs which need processing landing on my desktop, coming in from collegues on the office LAN, which I similarly have access to at home. With automator I can sort the images into different folders, based upon the date they where taken, the orientation of the frame, the photographer who took them, in fact anything which distinguishes the file in some way from the hundreds of other files waiting to be attended to can be used to automatically affect a whole range of sorting and processing actions, including batch copying, rotation and resizing, auto-light balancing, tiff to jpeg conversion and effects filtering, when used in conjunction with Graphic Converter.

  • Text and graphics clippings. Anything you can highlight with the mouse can be picked up and dropped onto the desktop, or into a folder and kept. Highlight this text with the mouse and click it, pausing for a moment until the cursor turns from a vertical "text" line to a regular pointer. You can now move the highlighted block as a sort of clipboard selection and drop it wherever you want to keep it.
  • You can also drag and drop these selections onto an application icon and with one click cut and paste any text and / or image. I use this all the time for keeping important information from emails in a stickies notepad, where I can glance at them quickly without having to create a new word or notepad document, just to remember a phone number or some other information which will no longer be as important in a week or a month's time. Best of all, if copying from a web page, the integrity of the format of the text and any HTML, like tables, is maintained. It's literally like clipping out an article from the page in a magazine. Wake up internet 2.0, my tech blog, has some video clip examples of this.

    Browsers & email.

    I always find it rather ironic that Microsoft Internet Explorer was, in the days of Apple Mac OS System 8 and 9, a much better browser than it's Windows equivalent. These days, however, Apple have a browser of their own, Safari.

    Similarly, once upon a time, Outlook and Eudora where the only email clients in town on the last of the "classic", pre-OS X Mac systems; where Apple now have their own Mail, to which only really weird people still use the many close, but no cigar alternatives, most notably Mozilla's Thunderbird.

    Safari, as with all OS X applications, supports built-in spell checking, making it a breeze to write everything from short comments in chat forums to entire blog entries and articles like this one, without having to leave the browser window to make sure your work is legible.

    As simple to use as right-clicking on any highlighted word, the in-line dictionary is probably the greatest unsung hero, among the many labour saving devices, in the modern Mac OS. Firefox unfortunately doesn't support in-line spell checking because it's windowing system uses java script, something Mozilla developers have been promising something would be done about for quiet some time now, with not so much as an unstable public beta to show for it. For this reason alone the majority of Mac users have stuck with Safari as their default browser, but when in-line spelling is resolved in Firefox it'll be interesting to see how many permanently switch.

    Safari is a great browser with all the functionality of tabs, button bookmarks for opening multiple links at once, Apple + I to send a whole page as an HTML email, middle scroll wheel clicking to open links in a new tab as well as being an acceptable RSS reader; but it lacks anything comparable to Firefox's extensions, which have made that browser the success it is on all three major platforms.

    Blogging.

    RapidWeaver is a sophisticated web site creation tool which pre-dates Apple's iWeb. It's strength is it's ease of use and it is a particularly good blogging tool. You can write and article, attach an iTunes friendly podcast to it and post everything necessary for a well formed XML, which in turn your readers and listeners will use to subscribe to your site and podcast, with no need to so much as write a line of HTML, let alone worry about understanding how it all works.

    On the Windows side a great application called ecto, which is also available for Mac, is probably the best example of a quick and easy blogging tool as you could wish for.

    To each his own.

    I hope, in conclusion, that I have touched upon some things you, the new Mac user, who perhaps still floats in and out of using Windows, found out about software and features you didn't already know of, and that this was of some use.

    I could have written on and on about various audio, photo and video editing tips, that being my area of expertise as it where. I'll be writing more on photography and image editing in a separate article coming soon.

    In contrast I found out something myself in the course of putting this article together that I need to learn a lot more about blogging software and email clients. I learned, ultimately what we could all do with being reminded of now and then, that there is always something to learn about computers. I'm just thankful I no longer need to learn anything to do with Windows, since I've managed over the course of the last 3 or 4 years to whittle my use of it down to literally once or twice a week for less than an hour, when I go through my various articles and contributions to other sites, as well as my own blogs, and make sure any HTML I've written is looking well in IE 6 and Firefox for Windows. After-all, we wouldn't want to go around extolling the virtues of the Mac way of doing things and have that message obscured in some way by a silly mistake, so feel free to contact me or comment here if you've noticed anything I should correct.

    Links and further information:

  • app zapper.
  • Mplayer and mencoder homepage.
  • ffmpegX homepage.
  • Snapz pro X - Screen capturing software.
  • The Linux on your iPod project
  • tmpgenc.
  • Elgato EyeTV
  • Pro tools
  • Digital Performer
  • Steinberg Cubase
  • Audacity
  • Adobe Audition.
  • Graphic Converter
  • RapidWeaver, Mac blogging and site creation software
  • Ecto, a great blogging tool for Mac and Windows.

    General reference and links:

  • AGNULA. An excellent article on open source audio recording.
  • The MacCast podcast is a great source of information for both new and well seasoned Mac users.
  • Wake up internet 2.0 - My tech blog, with video clip examples from this article.
    • 19 Votes
    • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

    Back To Top

    Published to:

    What's this?
    Who's leading the conversation?
    This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
    3.4
    1.1
    0.4
    {"commentId":104808,"authorDomain":"hallo"}
    Daniel A. HalloDeleted
    {"commentId":104963,"authorDomain":"jsuplido"}

    Daniel meant the use of bullets... Option+8 = • :)

    {"commentId":104963,"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388","authorDomain":"jsuplido"}
      Reply#2 - Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:05 PM EDT
      {"commentId":105081,"authorDomain":"adamkemp"}

      You shouldn't use this method for web publishing. That's a non-ascii character, so it won't show up correctly if the user's brower is using a different character set. You should either use the HTML list tags (<ul> <li>...</li> ... </ul>) or use the html character entity for the bullet, which is &bull;.

      Ever seeen a page that had a bunch of ?'s where the quotes should go? That's because they tried using special characters for fancy quotes. There are character entities for those too. The net would be a prettier place if people followed standards. :)

      {"commentId":105081,"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388","authorDomain":"adamkemp"}
      • 2 votes
      #2.1 - Sun Apr 23, 2006 6:35 PM EDT
      {"commentId":105176,"authorDomain":"hallo"}
      Daniel A. HalloDeleted
      Reply
      {"commentId":104965,"authorDomain":"adamkemp"}

      Note that you can take screenshots in windows by pressing the Print Screen button (up in the top-right, next to Scroll Lock). To get just the current window, press Alt+Print Screen. I don't think there's a way to have it automatically save the file, though. At work I use Synergy to share my mouse and keyboard between a Windows box, a Linux box, and my MacBook. When I need to take a screenshot in Windows, I just hit Print Screen, then move the mouse over to my Linux box and paste it into The Gimp. It works pretty well.

      Is there a way to make the Mac method save to a specific location instead of the Desktop?

      {"commentId":104965,"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388","authorDomain":"adamkemp"}
        Reply#3 - Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:06 PM EDT
        {"commentId":104979,"authorDomain":"hallo"}
        Daniel A. HalloDeleted
        {"commentId":105136,"authorDomain":"hearditonthe"}

        Alt+Printscreen is a new one on me for Windows Adam, so thanks for that.

        TinkerTool allows you to change a number of hidden Finder options, including the file format of the screen capture (PNG, GIF, PSD & TIF off the top of my head) and I think it allows you to change the default save location too.

        {"commentId":105136,"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388","authorDomain":"hearditonthe"}
          #3.2 - Sun Apr 23, 2006 8:00 PM EDT
          Reply
          {"commentId":104974,"authorDomain":"daftpunk"}

          I'm going to soon be a switcher as long as my dad comes through with his moolah for me. I've been reading through tonnes of articles like this, thanks! One question I would have is adding RAM and things like that. Is it cheaper to buy from a third party than from Apple? What about connecting to windows based networks?

          {"commentId":104974,"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388","authorDomain":"daftpunk"}
            Reply#4 - Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:10 PM EDT
            {"commentId":105066,"authorDomain":"alexanderj"}

            Third party RAM is always cheaper for Macs, usually by a substantial amount. I've heard good things about www.macsales.com, but I would cross-reference that with someone who has purchased from them. If by "networks" you mean a wireless/wired router feeding an internet connection to many computers, you can plug both PCs and Macs into one just fine.

            {"commentId":105066,"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388","authorDomain":"alexanderj"}
              #4.1 - Sun Apr 23, 2006 6:16 PM EDT
              {"commentId":105094,"authorDomain":"adamkemp"}

              You can connect to a windows share in the Finder by select Connect to Server... from the Go menu (or press Command+K). Then enter smb://servername/sharename in the Server Address: field and click Connect. You can add it to your favorites by clicking the + button before you connect. Once you've connected it shows up as a drive on the top-left of your Finder window.

              You can also browse Network shares by clicking on Network in the top left of the Finder window, then choose Servers. This may or may not list the available Windows servers, depending on your network setup.

              {"commentId":105094,"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388","authorDomain":"adamkemp"}
              • 1 vote
              #4.2 - Sun Apr 23, 2006 6:46 PM EDT
              {"commentId":105139,"authorDomain":"hearditonthe"}

              Ditto with both those comments on RAM and Networks Daft Punk (if that's you're real name).

              I was pleasantly surprised at how easy it was to share my Mac, Linux and Windows machines across ethernet using samba, but it can be quite slow if you're planning on moving and copying large amounts of data across it regularly.

              {"commentId":105139,"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388","authorDomain":"hearditonthe"}
                #4.3 - Sun Apr 23, 2006 8:04 PM EDT
                {"commentId":105143,"authorDomain":"hearditonthe"}

                One other thing to bare in mind on samba is that you have to enable Windows Sharing in System Preferences > Internet & Network > Sharing to see the folders you are sharing on the Windows machine from the Mac.

                {"commentId":105143,"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388","authorDomain":"hearditonthe"}
                  #4.4 - Sun Apr 23, 2006 8:07 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":105203,"authorDomain":"DrJuice"}

                  I had file sharing set up with my family's HP down in the living room. It worked for about a day and now it doesn't show up any more. I had it enabled on the HP in my account, do I need to set it up for every account on that computer?

                  {"commentId":105203,"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388","authorDomain":"DrJuice"}
                    #4.5 - Sun Apr 23, 2006 10:14 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":105215,"authorDomain":"hearditonthe"}

                    Short answer is yes, Andrew.

                    You'll also see options, on Windows, which say something like "tick here to share this folder every-time I log on", or something along those lines. Say "Yes".

                    {"commentId":105215,"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388","authorDomain":"hearditonthe"}
                      #4.6 - Sun Apr 23, 2006 10:32 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":105973,"authorDomain":"daftpunk"}

                      Cheers James. And I'll have you know this is my real name!

                      {"commentId":105973,"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388","authorDomain":"daftpunk"}
                        #4.7 - Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:55 PM EDT
                        Reply
                        {"commentId":105383,"authorDomain":"soundscape"}
                        Similarly with Windows the user must be logged into an account which has administrative privileges, but rather inconveniently it doesn't allow temporary admin access for the installation of applications to ordinary users.

                        This is incorrect. As a "limited user" you will not be able to install software. However there is a "Run As" option that will appear by holding SHIFT and right-clicking on any .exe or .msi icon.

                        {"commentId":105383,"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388","authorDomain":"soundscape"}
                          Reply#5 - Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:30 AM EDT
                          {"commentId":105385,"authorDomain":"soundscape"}

                          Sorry I left out something.

                          Great Article :)

                          I'm switching to Mac as soon as my finances permit, and this article will most certainly come in handy.

                          Nice Job.

                          {"commentId":105385,"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388","authorDomain":"soundscape"}
                            #5.1 - Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:31 AM EDT
                            {"commentId":105652,"authorDomain":"hearditonthe"}

                            Thanks and thanks SoundScape. I've never managed to convince "run as.." to actually work, but I'll take your word for it.

                            {"commentId":105652,"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388","authorDomain":"hearditonthe"}
                              #5.2 - Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:22 AM EDT
                              {"commentId":105680,"authorDomain":"soundscape"}

                              It does have issues with installing some types of software - e.g. certain more-complex printer drivers and so forth. A lot of that has to do with the loose requirements MS puts forward to software developers for writing software thats compatible with its OS.
                              I've found it to work 90% of the time though.

                              {"commentId":105680,"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388","authorDomain":"soundscape"}
                                #5.3 - Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:53 AM EDT
                                Reply
                                {"canLink":false,"threadId":"6445","isPrivate":false}
                                Leave a Comment:
                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                {"threadId":"6445","contentId":"174388"}
                                Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                Stop TrackingStop Tracking